Josh Benner

Category: Ethics

  • no, looting is not just like the boston tea party

    Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

    I’ve seen umpteen people compare the looting and riots occurring to the Son’s of Liberty in the Boston Tea Party. They’re not the same. Writing for the Federalist, Joshua Lawson points out that the Boston Tea Party was not about plundering for person gain. They didn’t loot the ships for the tea, they dumped into the harbor. They didn’t burn down the ships, they didn’t cause physical harm to people. The only injury in the Boston Tea Party was one of the Son’s of Liberty who was hit by a tea crate. The only personal item damaged was a lock which was replaced by the Son’s of Liberty. The looting largely went after personal property. The Boston Tea Party was specifically a protest against the government.

    But all of this raises an important philosophical question. If you look at the Boston Tea Party as a justification for rioting and looting today as a response to an unfair system, to oppression, as long as the system is the way that it is, by the logic of your justification, shouldn’t rioting and looting be justified at anytime until the system is changed? Honest question. If someone looting tonight or last weekend was justified, why shouldn’t that also be justified six weeks from now? Or six months from now? If someone is looting in opposition to injustice, how do you put a timeline on when it is and isn’t acceptable? Where’s the consistency?

    I maintain that it’s wrong to steal and it’s wrong to harm private businesses. It undermines the vast majority of demonstrators who are peaceful and law abiding citizens. Not only is the looting morally wrong, it’s also counterproductive. It’s wrong to steal and it’s wrong to hurt private businesses.

    The Boston Tea party also brought consequences upon the colonies where Britain passed the “Intolerable Acts” in retaliation. They did have to pay for that rebellion. Being a revolutionary has consequences. I find it interesting that people talk of the horrors of troops being used in major cities to help regain civil obedience. But for rioters who are talking and acting like revolutionaries, what should they expect? Above all else, the job of government is to maintain law and order. It’s shameful that mayors were allowing people to ride roughshod in their cities over the weekend. That is a disservice to their communities.

    Again, I’m not talking about the peaceful protesters. And I know the vast majority of protesters are peaceful and have a right to be angry and to protest. But society should have no acceptance of those who seek to cause looting and destruction.

    Thanks for reading! I welcome your comments and don’t forget to subscribe.

  • James MacDonald starting home church network less than a year after being fired from mega church

    JMacDonald_-_Walk_in_the_Word.jpg
    James MacDonald. Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

    A year ago, James MacDonald was fired from Harvest Bible Chapel, a megachurch located primarily around Chicago, which he had founded more than 30 years ago.

    MacDonald’s dismissal came after Chicago radio host Mancow Muller played explosive clips of MacDonald criticizing investigative reporter Julie Roys, Christianity Today editor Mark Galli (and making implications about an inappropriate relationship between them). He makes reference to putting illegal materials on the computer of the former Christianity Today editor (not suggesting that this event actually happened).

    At the time of his dismissal, MacDonald had faced years of criticism for domineering leadership towards staff and church members as well as abuse and mismanagement of church finances.

    This week, MacDonald has announced that he is starting his own home church network.

    In a statement on his website, MacDonald said:

    “I am not disillusioned with traditional local church, but large churches present complicating logistics and often negatively affect Christian relationships. For that reason, we feel led by the Lord to offer an alternative for those who need it – something different and refreshing that we are calling the Home Church Network – with all the impact of a large church but none of the drama.”

    -James MaDonald

    Commentary
    I’m sorry for being such a cynic but this is all very rich.

    A pastor who was rightfully fired because of his own sin says that he’s not disillusioned with traditional local church.

    Why would he be? The local church wasn’t the problem. The irony is that many of the things that drive people away from churches are the very things MacDonald perpetuated in his ministry: enriching himself off of people’s generosity, unchecked power, cult of personality, etc.

    And he has the audacity to clear the air that he doesn’t have any animosity against the local church?

    Second thing about this story that catches my attention.  MacDonald says: large churches present complicating logistics and often negatively affect Christian relationships.

    Once again, I find this interesting. A man who was fired from a large church is going to throw the large church movement under the bus because it’s the logistics which can negatively impact

    Christian relationships? He will also talk of the drama that exists in large churches.

    From reading his website, it seems like home groups will meet and watch videos of his teaching and utilize worship music that is put together through the ministry.

    This alternative already exists. He didn’t invent the idea of house church. It goes back to the New Testament era. In recent years, it has seen growing popularity in America. It’s also a common church style for Christians in many parts of the world where they face the risk of persecution for being Christians. And for MacDonald, it’s his newest avenue of ministry. In his statements, he again throws large churches under the bus for their “drama.”

    It’s the pot calling the kettle black.

    I know I’m being harsh. But it’s because I love the local church. And I hate seeing people abusing the local church. I think it’s shameful that time and again, megachurch pastors get caught up in areas of major sin and are disqualified from leading in their churches. When this happens, with few exceptions, they almost never stay away. MacDonald is starting a home church network.

    Same old story
    Mark Driscoll was removed for abusive leadership. He’s now leading a new church. Tulian Tchividjian was removed for having an affair, then hired by Willow Creek. Then he was fired again when another previously undisclosed affair became known. Then he started a new church. Perry Noble was fired from the megachurch he started in South Carolina for alcoholism and familial neglect, then divorced, and about a year and a half later, started another church.

    And there are many other examples. Ted Haggard using drugs and hiring a male prostitute, Jim Bakker with his affairs and fraud (he went to prison), Jimmy Swaggart and his prostitution scandal.

    And all of them are back in churches or ministries.

    That isn’t the way it’s supposed to be.

    The good news of the gospel is that no matter what a person has done, no matter how great the sin, that for the person who has trusted in Jesus, there is grace and forgiveness.

    But that’s not the debate. The issue is when you have pastors who are disqualified from leading on legitimate Biblical grounds, and who sit on the bench for a few months and proclaim themselves fit to lead.

    MacDonald didn’t even wait a year. And the pattern seems to often be that after a little time away, the pastor declares himself as ready to lead again within the church.

    Can a pastor ever be restored? It’s difficult because part of the qualification is that he be above reproach. But the restoration should never be as simple as a person deciding that they’re all better and ready to pastor again. None of these people are so valuable that the church can’t function without them. Ministry is a sacred privilege, not a right.

    Thanks for reading! I’d love to hear what you think, and don’t forget to subscribe!

     

  • Holocaust Remembrance Day and the evils of humanity

    34833591576_7080ab642b_c.jpg
    Today is International Holocaust Remembrance Day. It was on this day 75 years ago, Auschwitz Concentration Camp was liberated. More than 1 million people lost their lives at Auschwitz while millions more perished in the hundreds of other concentration camps run by the Nazis.

    But tragically, on a day set apart to remember those who were lost, our world is increasingly forgetting about the holocaust. (more…)

  • Hypocrites in church isn’t the issue. Faithless pseudo-Christians are the issue.

    drama-312318_960_720

    Originally published June 27, 2017

    A lot of people don’t want to be in a church because?

    Because the church is full of?

    Hypocrites.

    Churches are filled with hypocrites. (more…)

  • Bachelorette talks about faith and premarital sex


    ABC reality show the Bachelorette is in the news regarding a confrontation from bachelorette Hannah Brown and contestant Luke Parker. Brown is a professing Christian and Parker is a born again Christian. The subject of sex outside of marriage came up in a conversation. Parker said “let’s say you have had sex with one – or multiple – of these guys, I would be wanting to go home.”

    Brown says “I’ve had sex and Jesus still loves me.” Certainly Jesus is infinitely gracious. But we also should not take a casual attitude towards sin. Brown has received criticism from many Christians this week. I think her attitude is one that has become too common among professing Christians. We take anyone pointing us to Christians teachings as them judging us. And we treat “thou shalt not judge” as the first and only commandment that matters in the 21st century. (more…)