Josh Benner

Author: the Josh Benner Blog

  • Not taking the Lord’s name in vain – more to it than just bad words

    photo-1499810631641-541e76d678a2

    The Third Commandment
    “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain.
    -Exodus 20:7
    The third commandment involves more than just not using God’s name in profanities. That’s part of it but it’s not the whole picture.
    In its historical context, it seems that part of the meaning of the third commandment involved swearing oaths in the Lord’s name. A person could make such an oath and yet fail to follow through, and God doesn’t want his name invoked with falsity.
    However this commandment is more broad than only applying to oaths.
    It also involves misusing the Lord’s title.
    Psalm 29:2: “Ascribe to the Lord the glory due his name; worship the Lord in the splendor of holiness.”
    In the beginning of the Lord’s prayer, Jesus addresses God the Father and says:
    “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name. (Matthew 6:9).
    God’s name is to be hallowed. It is to be spoken in reverence.
    There are still Orthodox Jews who won’t say the word God out of concern that they’ll never say his name with due reverence.
    We must keep in mind the awesome holiness of the Lord when we invoke his name.
    The Westminister Confession of Faith puts it well:
    The third commandment requireth the holy and reverent use of God’s names, titles, attributes, ordinances, Word, and works.
    But another way how people speak the name of the Lord in vain is by misrepresenting God theologically.
    People often attempt to speak for God. People will say what God’s standards are for love but it can misrepresent God’s holiness and justice.
    People speak for God in comparison to other religions.
    People who don’t seek to honor God speak for what God does or doesn’t accept.
    This is a terrible blasphemy against the Lord.
    We misuse the name of the Lord when we speak for God in ways that are not true to how God has revealed himself in scripture.
    We see that at the heart of the original sin.
    God originally gave one commandment.
     “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Genesis 2:16-17).
    But his words were twisted.
    Genesis 3:1: “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?”
    He never said such a thing.
    But then Eve responded by further misrepresenting the words of the Lord.
    Genesis 3:2-3
    2 And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ”
    And the serpent undermines the consequences that God had spoken.
    Genesis 3:5: “You will not surely die.”
    Listen to the ways people talk about God. It’s a pattern that constantly happens.
    Twisting his words. Speaking on his behalf in false ways.
    Terrible sins.
    In undermining the consequences of God’s word, we make God out to be a lair and there is no deceit in the Lord. He is true to his word.
    This is part of the reason why it’s so important to have such reverence for the scripture.
    Because people are imperfect but God’s word is perfect.
    2 Timothy 3:16-17 says: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.”
    Unfortunately, our society has little Biblical literacy today.
    As we continue to study the Israelites, we will see that it had consequences for them and we suffer consequences in our world for a lack of reverence and training in God’s word.
    So in the first three commands, we get glimpses of the position where God is to be in our lives: first. We see glimpses of the reverence for how God wants us to approach him.

    Josh Benner is the associate pastor at Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church in Fergus Falls, Minnesota and has a Master of Divinity from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He enjoys writing about faith and culture. He lives with his wife Kari in Minnesota.

  • What Would Jesus Fly?

    photo-1483450388369-9ed95738483c.jpeg

    In a popular video, televangelist Jesse Duplantis appeals to potential supporters of his desire to purchase a $54 million jet for his ministry which would allow Duplantis to travel anywhere in the world non-stop.

    Duplantis’s ministry already has a private jet (though they’re slumming it in a jet that can’t fly anywhere non-stop). And they can certainly buy a new jet if they want to and have the money. Although I don’t understand why a person would donate money for that purpose.

    Duplantis says, “I really believe that if the Lord Jesus Christ was physically on the Earth today, he wouldn’t be riding a donkey, he’d be in an airplane flying all over the world.”

    Would he?

    Or would Jesus (if he decided to fly) be in coach, with the people?

    If Jesus was given $54 million, an incredible amount of money, would the first thought to be to buy something to help him get to people? Or would it be to turn back around and give that money back to the people?

    Duplantis wanting all of this money for a jet so they can travel non-stop rubs me the wrong way because it’s such an extravagant expense with the premise that the ministry and what they’re doing is so important that they don’t have time to stop for fuel.

    Take a pit stop!

    If you have that type of fund raising power, use the money for more noble causes.

    Josh Benner is the associate pastor at Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church in Fergus Falls, Minnesota and has a Master of Divinity from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He enjoys writing about faith and culture. He lives with his wife Kari in Minnesota.

  • Roseanne, the NFL and hypocrisy

    Roseanne_Logo.svg

    Roseanne Barr made an offensive comment about former Obama Administration official Valerie Jarrett. Shortly after, ABC announced they have cancelled the show Roseanne.

    That the show was canceled is not shocking. People don’t like offensive and racially charged comments (nor should we).

    It’s interesting reading Tweets and comments about the cancellation. Many draw a parallel between Barr’s comments and how some will defend her and say the show shouldn’t be canceled. But some of those same people are fine with the NFL banning players kneeling during the National Anthem. This is pointed to as being hypocritical.

    The irony is that the hypocrisy can run on both sides. To think that the players should be able to kneel without consequences yet to think Roseanne should be cancelled is also somewhat hypocritical.

    Because in both instances, it shows us that we cannot always say or do whatever we want without that having ramifications on our professional lives.

    As a society, there are things we don’t like. We don’t like racist comments. We don’t generally like unpatriotic behaviors. People can say whatever they want. People can take whatever political stance they want to make. But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t ever consequences.

    Neither ABC nor the NFL owes it to Roseanne Barr or the players to promote ideals that go against what they stand for.

    Some will disagree with that. “It’s not the same. Players are making a reasonable protest and Roseanne make a comment that can’t be defended.” While we should all be able to agree that what Roseanne said was wrong, millions of people find kneeling during the national anthem just as offensive (if not more offensive) than one woman’s comment.

    Roseanne already had a target on her for various other political comments and comments seen as being racially insensitive. It was wrong to make the comment that she made about Jarrett. It’s not shocking that ABC cancelled the show.

    But it is an unfortunate situation. It’s unfortunate that in a politically charged country where division is high, we had a throwback sitcom that people of various views enjoyed from a time when there were not such heightened political sensitivities. The new Roseanne had the goal of a show where a family who was divided politically and who was navigating the 21st century could still come together in love. That’s a message that we don’t often hear in the media. Because of an unnecessary comment, it’s a voice that will now go silent.

    And the political divide widens.

    But I want to take our attention back to the double standards we so often have. If we are ok with either Roseanne being cancelled or with NFL players being forbidden from kneeling, than we must also accept the other can happen too. Because both are examples that freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences of that speech.

    We must all remember the power of our words and actions. The Apostle James said: “The tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great things. How great a forest is set ablaze by such a small fire!” (James 3:5). We’re blessed to live in a nation with the First Amendment. It’s a wonderful thing. But let us not assume that words are free of consequences, or that they don’t matter greatly. 

    Josh Benner is the associate pastor at Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church in Fergus Falls, Minnesota and has a Master of Divinity from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He enjoys writing about faith and culture. He lives with his wife Kari in Minnesota.

  • Memorial Day 2018

    Seals_of_the_United_States_Armed_Forces.pngAmerican Revolution – 25,000
    War of 1812 – 15,000
    Civil War – 364,511
    World War I – 116,516
    World War II – 405,399
    Korean War – 36,516
    Vietnam – 58,209
    Afghanistan and Iraq – 6,713

    To the hundreds of thousands of men and women who gave their lives in the service and defense of America, thank you.

     

  • The importance of the Old Testament to the New Testament

    Bible
    Photo courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons @freaktography

    Originally published April 19, 2016

    I recently had a friend ask me a question about a verse in Paul’s letter to the Ephesians. Paul will have passages where every verse seems to have different possible interpretations and where they can seem impossibly difficult. As I was researching this complicated passage, I couldn’t help but think “The Old Testament is so much simpler!” (more…)