Josh Benner

Category: News

  • Write now, Tweet later: with Buffer

    Came across a new site today for a service called Buffer. And so far, I like it.

    Buffer is a site that allows you to Tweet, and then add a timestamp to the Tweet so that it doesn’t necessarily have to post right when you create it.

    Why would anyone care to do this?

    Well because there are some people who might have several good ideas for Tweets at once, and if they string a bunch of random updates together simultaneously, it can just be white noise to your followers. With Buffer, you can create all of those brilliant Tweets now, but then use the service to space out when they actually post to Twitter.

    That way, you’re not overwhelming your followers. Or, if you’re on death row, you can send Buffer tweets right before they strap you down to the lethal injection table and be like:

    12:05am: “Wow, that was another great episode of Conan. lmao”

    and then

    12:35am: “jk, I was already dead by then, LoLz”

    Part of the idea is that if you can space your Tweets out, ideally you can post at times where the Tweets will have a higher impact.

    At 5pm, it automatically updates by posting to Twitter. Simple.

    The service runs on a freemium model. For no cost, you can do two Tweets a day (or have 5 tweets in your buffer). There are monthly rates of $5 and $20, each giving different premium services.

    Constructive criticisms:

    1. No smartphone app. I realize that the entire point of Buffer is so you can produce Tweets at a computer and then set them to post later, but if that’s useful, I don’t see why the idea to post Tweets to an Android or iPhone app that will post to Twitter later is also useful. It’s not a deal breaker, but I hope an app is forthcoming (although I do expect basically any site that offers any service that has ever been created to have its own app).

    2. This is a little bit more of an issue. Once you’ve logged in to Buffer, You type your Tweets in the “My buffer” section, however to change the time that the Tweet posts, you go to the “account”section. I don’t understand why you can’t just look at the Tweet in the “My buffer” section, where it SHOWS you the time, and change it through that page. #imjustsaying

    3. Unless I missed something, I don’t see a place where you can set a date for a different Tweet to post. Everything is set to post within a 24 hour period. I feel like if you’re going to have advanced Tweet writing, then the functionality to do stuff, days, weeks, centuries in advance is necessary.

    Buffer, I bestow you with probably the greatest offer I can give to a webstie: I am adding the Buffer blog to my rss reader.

    for more information on Buffer, visit their website: http://bufferapp.com

    I learned about this website from Hacker News. Thanks Hacker News.

    Here’s their website: http://news.ycombinator.com/

  • Amber Alerts now available on Facebook

    I’ve said before that I feel that people increasingly love online social networking, but don’t necessarily love Facebook. But Facebook is the best place to go to connect with friends and relatives and so we go there. With Facebook itself, people are largely growing more and more annoyed.

    Well, with at least one new feature on Facebook, I would like to applaud the site today. AMBER alert notifications are now available on Faceboo. Each state has it’s own AMBER Alert Facebook page. You can simply search “Amber Alert” and the name of your state, it will bring that page up, click “like” and you’re set.

    It’s that simple.

    In case you are unfamiliar: an AMBER Alert is a notification that a child has been abducted locally. It is a collaborative effort with various law enforcement, transportation, broadcasting institutions, and the wireless industry, according to amberalert.gov

    Part of the point is to utilize so many different types of technologies in an effort to locate the missing person as quickly as possible.

    jrb

    questions/comments, feel free to Tweet @bennernotes (just as soon as you login to Facebook and “like” your state’s Amber alert notification page)

  • Why your Android doesn’t have that trojan everyone is talking about

    No. You did not download the Trojan that is running on Android. Have you downloaded any third party apps from China lately? No, you haven’t, and so you don’t have the Trojan.

    I’m seeing a lot of posts on Twitter talking about the Trojan. I think the fact that people like to use social networking sties to spread the word when there are risks is wonderful.

    However, a negative is that it can sometimes make something a bigger story than it really needs to be and cause more confusion about whether or not an individual’s phone might have the malware.

    Mobile Lookout posted on their blog yesterday that an application which has been named “Geinimi” has been running on recreated versions of legitimate applications (mostly games) on third party Chinese Android app markets.

    But it has only been detected on Chinese apps, so you really don’t need to worry about it.

    For what it’s worth, in order to even download a third party app on an Android, you would need to go to “Settings -> Applications -> Unknown Sources” and check the unknown sources box to have the capability.

    Also, this application asked for downloaders to give it permissions which far exceed the normal permissions you grant any ordinary application you would ever download in Android Market. Checking the box also brings up a warning that you must ok.

    So for the vast majority of Android owners, it would not even be possible for you to get the Trojan.

    For people who have checked to receive applications from unknown services, they need to know the risk they’re taking and pay special attention to what they’re downloading.

    Also, if you haven’t downloaded Mobile Lookout or some other safety application that scans what you download, you really should. It’s free.

    jrb

    questions or comments? email benner.joshua@gmail.com or twitter @bennernotes

    Link to the Mobile Lookout blog post on Trojan http://bit.ly/f8hTtB

  • Skype having worldwide connection issues

    Skype, the popular person to person video communication site went down globally today. This is the first time since 2007 that this has occurred. In a blog post at around 4:00 est, Skype addressed the issue and stated that engineers are working to fix the problem but that it may take several hours to be completely resolved.

    For some, Skype is already working, but if there is someone with whom you wish to Skype, he or she might not currently have access to the service. Again, it could be several hours before everything is working properly.

    In the vast majority of instances, the site is still not working propperly as of 8:48pm e.s.t.

    Why is Skype down?

    The Skype blog post attempted to explain it:

    “Skype isn’t a network like a conventional phone or IM network – instead, it relies on millions of individual connections between computers and phones to keep things up and running. Some of these computers are what we call ‘supernodes’ – they act a bit like phone directories for Skype.”

    What does that mean? The response is a bit complicated to understand, so let me try to explain what I think is happening.

    If two people are communicating on Skype and the peer to peer relationship has been established across the network (according to “An experimental study of the Skype peer to peer VoIP system). Skype has various fail safes in case the initial connection between one or multiple parties is blocked (by something like a firewall).

    A supernode is created when nodes are in areas with extra bandwidth and that are public (according to the same peer to peer study).

    If you connect with someone on a regular basis and the two of you typically use the same computers, you are connecting by nodes. Supernodes are what finds the person when the node doesn’t work to immediately locate them, according to the Skype post.

    The Skype post continues:

    “Under normal circumstances, there are a large number of supernodes available. Unfortunately, today, many of them were taken offline by a problem affecting some versions of Skype.”

    Skype did not say why the supernodes are uncharacteristically failing today. To me, that’s the most interesting aspect of the entire situation! It is possibly too early to tell what has caused the problem.

    Ironically, Twitter also was temporarily slow this afternoon on the east coast and the slow down could have partially been a result of increased traffic from people who were not using Skype (many of whom undoubtedly using Twitter for the purposes of complaining about Skype not working).

    Click here for the official Skype blog post on today’s slowdown:

    http://bit.ly/gQw0hg

    For the really cool study I cited on how Skype’s person to person VoIP works, click here: http://bit.ly/giOpUW

    jrb

    questions or comments? Tweet me @bennernotes or email benner.joshua@gmail.com